blog Archives - Page 33 of 41 - California Agriculture News Today

Meeting to Discuss Water Shortages and Delta Issues

Water Meeting in Hanford, Aug. 9

State Assemblymember Rudy Salas (D-Bakersfield) will lead a group discussing California’s water crisis during a hearing in Hanford on Aug. 9.

Salas, chairman of the Select Committee on Regional Approaches to Addressing the State’s Water Crisis, will be joined by local and regional water experts to share real-time data and facts about the water crisis and how it affects the Central Valley.

Topics will range from critical water issues like supply cutbacks and aging infrastructure to record droughts and the deteriorating Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta.

“It is critical that after these meetings, we have an accurate assessment of the Valley’s water needs and what future options should be considered to improve and stabilize water reliability through the region and state,” said Salas, in a release. “Having a reliable, clean water source is vital to the health, safety and economic growth of our state’s population and economy.”

The hearing will take place from 9:30 to 11:30 a.m. in the Kings County Board of Supervisors Chamber, 1400 W. Lacey Blvd. The public is encouraged to attend.

More information can be found by contacting Josh Golden at (559) 585-7170.

Patrick Cavanaugh2016-05-31T19:47:05-07:00August 7th, 2013|

CALIFORNIA LETTUCE FILLS EAST COAST VOID

Lettuce Prices Continue to Soar

While continued poor weather, such as heavy rains and unusual high heat, has hit the East Coast, and lettuce growers there are struggling to harvest a quality crop, it’s a big boom for California growers who are gladly filling the gap with higher prices.

“There are no complaints on our end,” noted Gabriela D’Arrigo, sales and marketing for D’Arrigo Bros. in Salinas. “It’s been more than a decade since the prices have been so high across the board,” she said. “The markets have been very good to us and to the other suppliers in Salinas.”

There is a big demand for iceberg lettuce as well as leafy greens and other vegetables, with some prices double what they were a year ago. “Many items are very short, the prices are up, and we are trying to fill orders for long time customers back east,” D’Arrigo said.

It’s been a very good run over the last six weeks as prices started to rise in late May. Depending on the items, D’Arrigo said that “fennel, romaine hearts, broccoli, cauliflower, and other lettuces have taken turns on which ones would be high any given week, giving us good margins.”

Patrick Cavanaugh2016-05-31T19:47:05-07:00August 6th, 2013|

Referendum is From Aug. 26 to Sept. 6

Kiwifruit Producers to Vote

On Marketing Order

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) today announced that kiwifruit producers will conduct a referendum on proposed amendments to the Federal Marketing Order for kiwifruit grown in California.

The referendum, scheduled for August 26 to September 6, 2013, will gauge voter support for five proposed amendments recommended by the Kiwifruit Administrative Committee (Committee). A proposed rule was issued in the Federal Register on August 2, 2013. Beginning August 19, USDA will mail ballot materials to all known growers who produced kiwifruit in California between August 1, 2012, and July 31, 2013.

If approved by voters, the proposed amendments would provide authority to: recommend and conduct production and postharvest research; recommend and conduct market research and development projects; receive and expend voluntary contributions; specify that recommendations for production research and market development be approved by eight members of the Committee; and update provisions regarding alternate members’ service

on the Committee.

The amendments will become effective if either two-thirds of the growers voting, or producers accounting for two-thirds of the volume of kiwifruit represented in the referendum, vote to approve the amendments.

USDA’s Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) will mail ballots and voting instructions to all eligible growers of record. Eligible growers who do not receive a ballot may contact Rose Aguayo or Kathie Notoro at USDA’s California Marketing Field Office, 2202 Monterey Street, Fresno, Calif. 93721; phone: (559) 487-5901.

Patrick Cavanaugh2016-05-31T19:47:05-07:00August 6th, 2013|

A Big Step For California Dairy Farmers

CDFA Secretary Ross Calls for Hearing

Help for Dairies May Be Close

By Patrick Cavanaugh, Editor

As hoped, California Department of Food And Agriculture Secretary Karen Ross called today for a hearing Sept. 12 to look at a new proposal that will change the 4b cheese milk formula.

“The secretary will have to take in evidence to support the changes that we were requesting in the petition,” said Michael Marsh, Chief Executive Officer of the Modesto-based Western United Dairyman.

CDFA Secretary Karen Ross

The petition asked for two things. A temporary price relief for dairy farmers with 46 cents per hundred-weight (CWT) surcharge on milk going into 4b cheese making. That price relief will go for one year.

An increase in the whey value in the 4b formula from the current 75 cents per hundredweight (CWT) up to $1 per CWT.

“This increase would add an additional $110 million to the pool of California dairy farmers. At the same time, it would not cost consumers a penny as it simply redistributes assets from the cheese makers back to the farmers.” said Marsh.

Marsh said the hearing will have to happen on Sept. 12, and then sometime after that date, Ross will implement any of the changes at a date that she will determine.

Ross told California Ag Today that she will need to see compelling evidence to advance the proposal.

Patrick Cavanaugh2016-05-31T19:47:05-07:00August 6th, 2013|

Delta Water Summit Coverage

Part 2

Delta Water Summit

Michael Connor Gives His Take

By Patrick Cavanaugh, Editor

Michael Connor, Commissioner of the U.S. Bureau of

Reclamation.

Michael Conner who heads up the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation noted that his bureau is engaging with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the National Marine Fisheries Service and the California Fish and Wildlife Service on short term help for water users.

“We are looking at ways where we can maintain the protected species, but to do it in a way that lessons the impact on water suppliers,” Connor said before 700 attendees at the Delta Water Summit at California Sate University Fresno on Saturday. “We need to have this conversation because of the seriousness of the situation that is immediately before us.”

Connor said that he met with farmers in the valley the day before the summit. “It’s very important to do that to understand the urgency,” he noted. “Many of the farmers noted that they have some flexibility that may enable them to make it through the next few years. But what I was really struck by was their concern about their neighbors who do not have the flexibility to keep going. The farmers noted that if their neighbors go out of production, then their community is at risk. It’s very sobering and necessary to be on the ground.”

Conner noted the Bureau moved a lot of water around this year to supplement farmers with their water needs, and we expect to do similar actions this coming water year. “We will try and broaden the scope of our actions and see what we can do to move more water for growers south of the Delta,” Connor said.

“We want to get the south of the Delta allocations as high as possible and then take supplemental water from other areas and make it available. This is becoming a more serious issue than it was in 2009,” said Connor.

Connor commented that he “wants to engage the water contractors, who we see as partners, and we need to move water that they secure between themselves. We need to do it with as little red tape as possible. We need to continue to act and even put in place more mechanisms to act at the urgency the current situation calls for.”

Connor noted that the Bureau is working hand in hand as partners with the water contractors in the state. “We know that the current water system in the state is unsustainable, and we need the BDCP to be successful.”

The 2013 Delta Water Summit crowd listens.

The possibility that 2014 will be worse than 2009 in terms of water allocations south of the Delta is creating great concern regarding massive unemployment of farm workers. It could also create more food lines in West Side towns. Connor noted that as a federal official, he needs to work with a broader set of agencies and is prepared to provide aid to the workers in this situation, similar to 2009.

“We need to take this discussion back to officials in Washington D.C., and I am committed to doing that,” he said. “The actions we want to take right now are in the areas of trying to get as much water as we can for the south of the Delta users to move forward. This is a serious situation, and we want to be in a position where we can keep as many folks employed and as many acres in production as we can.”

Conner responded to a question from the audience on the possibility of a two-year moratorium on water reductions to south of Delta farmers, as the Bureau and U.S. Fish and Wildlife figure out the Delta Smelt’s habitat and biology.

Conner answered, “We maintain compliance both in water quality standards and the Endangered Species Act. So there is not the ability to call a two-year moratorium, as we need to maintain protection of the fish, whether they are Delta Smelt with the biological opinion or several species of salmon that are affected by many issues in the Delta.”

“But I do agree that we need a whole lot more, and better information. We are continuing to try and improve how we apply the ESA instead of blanket rules, such as ‘you can’t pump this much during this time.’ We need to know where the fish are. Can we maintain levels of pumping and not have blanket rules that control the pumps?” Connor asked. “Instead, we must base decisions on a dynamic assessment of the situation. We would improve with respect to our understanding of turbidity and the location of the smelt. We are trying to do the same thing with respect to salmon and when those fish come through.”

“We are even looking at the “take” statements. How do we recalculate how much take is viable and still maintain the overall population of the species? All of this must be on the table,” Connor said.

Birmingham Sets Acree Straight

Earlier in the day, following a statement by Chris Acree, Executive Director of Revive the San Joaquin, in which he said that fish should have high priority in the Delta, Tom Birmingham, general manager of Westlands Water District stated,

Tom Birmingham, General Manager, Westlands Water

District.

“Chris, you are just wrong; you are absolutely wrong. The way that the Endangered Species Act is being applied today gives absolutely no consideration to the effects it has on human beings,” Birmingham said. “In 1973, when the ESA was passed, I cannot imagine one member of Congress who would have said, ‘We are going to put people in a food line, because we want to protect a fish is smaller than my little finger.'”

“In fact, immediately after the ESA was enacted, a fish known as the snail darter was preventing the construction of Tellico Dam in Tennessee, on the Little Tennessee River. But after a battle, Congress eventually exempted the Tellico dam from the ESA,” Birmingham said.

Birmingham noted that, “protecting these fish is a very laudable goal, and I would agree with you, it doesn’t have to be fish vs. people, but the human species must be considered a part of the evaluation.”

Patrick Cavanaugh2016-05-31T19:47:05-07:00August 5th, 2013|

Reservoir Critically Low

Dry Signs of the Times

The San Luis Reservoir is at nearly record lows; the photo was taken on August 2, 2013. This water deficit is due, in part, to less than average rainfall and snow during the last winter, but also because of an environmental release to the ocean of 800,000 acre-feet of water also during the winter.

The total capacity of San Luis Reservoir is 2,041,000 acre-feet.

Patrick Cavanaugh2016-05-31T19:47:05-07:00August 5th, 2013|

Merced County Farm Bureau Co-Hosts Event

Fight For Water Film Aug. 21 at UC Merced

Merced County residents will have the opportunity to view “The Fight for Water: A Farm Worker Struggle” a documentary based on the historic 2009 march across the Westside of the Central Valley to the San Luis Reservoir by farmers and farm workers.

On Wednesday, August 21, 2013, the filmmaker, Juan Carlos Oseguera will be screening his film at the University of California Merced Lakireddy Theater at 6:30 p.m. Admission is Free.

Juan Carlos Oseguera, Filmmaker

This film interviews people who were facing economic perils, and united themselves to demand that irrigation restrictions be lifted and water supplies be returned for the betterment of the community. The film, which has been screening at film festivals, won an “Honorable Mention Award” for Best Documentary Feature at the Los Angeles Movie Awards. It was recently chosen as an Official Selection to the Action on Film International Film Festival, which will be held August 16-24 2013 in Monrovia, California.

This special screening is being co-sponsored by the University of California Merced; Merced Irrigation District; the California Farm Water Coalition; the Merced County Farm Bureau Federation; and Yosemite Farm Credit. The Lakireddy Theater is located at 5200 N. Lake Road, Merced, Classroom and Office Building (COB) 102. The film will begin at 6:30 p.m. and will be followed by a panel discussion featuring film participants and local stakeholders.

The film features Joe Del Bosque, and George Delgado, both Westside farmers with operations in Fresno and Merced Counties. During the film these local farmers share their personal experiences about how a federal court ruling designed to protect the Delta smelt contributed to fields going dry throughout portions of the Westside. The frustration in the community peaked in 2009 when farmers received only 10 percent of their water allocations, while refuges that protect threatened fish received all of the water designated to them. Oseguera’s work gives a voice to people who were most affected by the man-made drought and shows the resulting unified story of survival.

As news reports continue to address the water shortages, Filmmaker Oseguera said he hopes the film provides a voice to farm laborers and their rural communities which have been overlooked in recent years. “My parents were migrant farmworkers and many of my relatives are still working in the fields,” he said. “This is lending a voice to that.”

Thanks to Amanda Carvajal Executive Director of the Merced County Farm Bureau, for administrating this post!

Patrick Cavanaugh2016-05-31T19:47:05-07:00August 4th, 2013|

BIG CROWD AT DELTA WATER SUMMIT

Delta Water Summit Elicits Many Questions

Part 1

Big Crowd Attends Summit

By Patrick Cavanaugh, Editor

And Laurie Greene, Associate Editor

A serious and vocal crowd of about 700 people representing farmers, farmworkers, others who derive their income from farming and Central Valley citizens who wanted to know more about Delta and water availability, packed the Satellite Student Union today, at California State University Fresno for the Delta Water Summit.

Mario Santoyo

The Delta Water Summit, organized by Mario Santoyo, Executive Director of the Latino Water Coalition, brought invited local and national elected officials, and representatives of California Water Agencies to answer questions from moderators and the public.

Here are some highlights of the three-hour summit.

The first panel, moderate by Ray Appleton, talk show host of KMJ, focused on the roles of water agencies regarding the challenges and expectations of the Bay Delta Conservation Plan (BDCP).

John Coleman

John Coleman, Vice President, Association of California Water Agencies (ACWA), said everyone in the room would agree that the water system in California is failing and we need to take responsibility for BDCP. And hopefully, the Water Bond to help fund BDCP will be on the ballot in 2014 such that we can fix the broken system so future generations will benefit.

Tom Birmingham, General Manager, Westlands Water District, spoke about the stressors in the Delta that are being blamed on farmers south of the Delta. Birmingham said, “I do not want to suggest that the operation of existing water projects are not affecting the species in the Delta. But there are numerous factors that are affecting the abundance of those species.”

Tom Birmingham

Birmingham noted that a few years ago, the Public Policy Institute of California issued a report stating: If you were to shut the two major water projects down entirely, quit diverting water upstream, quit pumping water out of the Delta, there is still more than a 50 percent chance that the species in the Delta which are currently at risk, would still go extinct.

“To suggest that what we have done over the course of the last 30 years in trying to protect these species is working, is absolutely nuts, as the species have continued to decline,” said Birmingham. “And the whole purpose of the BDCP is to take a different approach. Rather than focusing on species-by-species restrictions or regulations, some of which conflict with one another. The purpose of the BDCP is to take a more holistic approach, take an ecosystem approach, to try something different in protecting the species. All the studies that have been done to date suggest that if we are going to save species in the Delta, and if we are going to preserve the economy of California, we have got to do this project,” he said.

Brent Walthall

Brent Walthall, Assistant General Manager of the Kern County Water Agency, based in Bakersfield, spoke about the stressors in the Delta and how the BDCP may help to fix these. “When the BDCP first started, it looked only at the flow of the water and how the operations of the state and federal projects worked,” Walthall said. “But there are a lot of stressors in the Delta, and we do not handle them well—or at all. And the reason is that the regulatory agencies are charged with enforcing the Endangered Species Act (ESA) on a project-by-project basis.”

“The regulatory agencies do not get to look at the ecosystem as a whole and decide what is wrong. They only get to look at the permits for a specific project and decide how to operate that one project, whether it’s a Federal Project, or a State Water Project,” Walthall said. “One of the unique aspects of the BDCP is that it can look at all the other stressors, and again, there are a lot of them. The conservation measures in the BDCP have 22 suggestions. Only one focuses on pumping; the other 21 address all the other stressors.”

“Biologists think these stressors are all significant,” Wathall continued, “but we do not have a high level of understanding; however, we are learning that they are quite important. For example, one important stressor is predation of non-native fish on native species. As a particularly impactful example, the non-native bass species are predators on the Delta Smelt and the out-migrating salmon after spawning. Apparently salmon is the favorite food of the bass species. And we have seen on the San Joaquin River side of the Delta, that as much as 90 percent of the salmon travelling on their way to the ocean are eaten before they get there, and we have done nothing to address this.”

“Neither the state nor the federal water projects have ever even come close to that kind of percentage,” said Wathall. “Our percentages are often only 12 to 15 percent.”

“If we can identify these other stressors, we can go a long way to solving the environmental problem and free up the water system to operate more as it was designed to do,” Wathall said.

Ron Jacobsma

On the question of how the BDCP would impact additional storage south of the Delta, Ron Jacobsma, General Manager, Friant Water Authority, noted that one of the projects that he and others have been following closely for more than a decade, is the Temperance Flat Reservoir, which would constructed behind Friant Dam and upriver on the San Joaquin. This would allow us to take advantage of the flood flows we periodically get. And when they come, they come big. In 2010/2011, we had close to one million acre-feet of floodwaters released over the Friant Dam into the San Joaquin River, and we could have really used some of that water. In the last two years we have been at 40 percent of adequate supply.

Jacobsma said, “The Friant Water Authority manages 1.8 million acre-feet with a 520,000 acre-foot-reservoir (Millerton Lake), and we are looking at how we can pull additional yields from that project. If you build a million-plus acre-foot-reservoir, the yield is about 150,000 acre-feet. That’s a key water supply because that’s essentially what we commit to environment through our restoration program downriver.”

“But the $2-3 billion cost of Temperance Flat water diverted for agricultural use does not work too well by itself,” Jacobsma continued. “But if we could get the Delta reliability back, the situation would change. Moving vast amounts of wet-year water and running out of storage south of the Delta, in the case of Temperance Flat, would be more feasible. In this way, we could integrate that storage facility through ground water. Exchanges which could potentially double the yield offer greater flexibility and provide water quality benefits to urban agencies, suddenly make the whole big monetary gulp for a little sip of benefits works a lot better. You must take advantage of the wet year flows.”

Plus there is the benefit to PG&E, to investing in the hydroelectric potential of the dam that could be produced cheaply.

Appleton then asked Jacobsma if the Temperance Flat would ever get built.

Jacobsma replied, “What we need to assess immediately, and the Bureau of Reclamation is on track to do so a year from now, is determine if the construction of Temperance Flat is even feasible. That will signal whether the project can be built. Then we have to figure out what the BDCP looks like. Both of these projects realistically, with litigation and other issues, are most likely 10-15 years out. But if we do not start taking steps now, then they never will happen.”

John Colemanwith ACWA noted that the BDCP is an evolving process and his agency wants it to be successful. “And increased storage is a very important part of the BDCP. But what would be the value of adding the additional storage?”

“If you were to look at the last 20 years, including wet years, we have not been able to take advantage of the existing storage,” Coleman said. “We could build a reservoir and flood the Sacramento Valley, and we could build all sorts of dams in the San Joaquin Valley for surface storage. But if you look at the history of the last two decades, there have been many wet years when the San Luis Reservoir did not fill. Unless we have the ability to move water from the Sacramento River system, across the Delta, and to the pumps, there is no additional value of storage south of the Delta. With the BDCP, new storage will be incredibly important. In November and December of 2012, there was a lot of water in the system, but we could not pump it because of restrictions imposed by the biological opinion for the protection of the Delta Smelt.

What do Next Year?

In the minds of most people at the Summit was what will happen next year.

Federal water districts such as Westlands, San Luis, Panoche and many other water service contractors south of the Delta have sustained a lot of damage from reduced water allocations. These districts span from Tracy all the way to Kettleman City, and they are all under the pressure of possible zero water allocations.

In terms of what to do next year if adequate rain does not happen, Birmingham predicted that the allocation could be zero, even if there is average rainfall across California. “It’s very likely that the final allocation may be very low, anywhere from zero to 10 percent, maybe 15 percent, which would be a repeat of what we saw in 2009,” Birmingham said. “Other than praying for heavy precipitation and snowfall, particularly in the San Joaquin River watershed, so that we can offset restrictions and biological opinions, I just do not know what can be done.

Over the course of time, we have utilized all the mechanisms available, so that today, there is very little flexibility concerning how we can get water to farmers on the West Side of the San Joaquin Valley.

Public Comments:

Manual Cunha, with Charlie Waters

In the audience, Charlie Waters, with FFA Farm Labor Services Inc., asked the big question: “At some point, we must make a realistic decision. Will it be man or fish? We can both exist, but we need farming to survive, and we need the water to farm,” Waters noted.

Waters then commented on the sewage flowing into the Delta from Sacramento and Stockton. “Their excuse in not cleaning up is that it’s too expensive. Come on now, we need to get tough. We need that water for farming and everything else.”

Phil Larson

Phil Larson, Fresno County Board of Supervisor, District One, commented, “We need to go to the top to deal with the biological opinion. In March, I went to Washington, D.C. and visited with U.S. Fish and Wildlife, and they stated to our California Association of Wine Grape Growers group that they were ‘tweaking the Endangered Species Act so it will be better for you in California’,” Larson said. “And I told them that the biggest stressor we have in California is the ESA, and problem is when you start tweaking it in D.C., it can become more of a problem. We all need to work with our legislators to explain that to them.”

We’ll post more coverage on the Summit over the next two days.

Patrick Cavanaugh2016-05-31T19:47:05-07:00August 4th, 2013|

FLORAL DIVERSITY BUILDS HONEY BEE SUPPLY

Extra Forage for Bees?

The Almond Board of California and Project Apis m. (PAm) are doing research on solutions for core honeybee pressures. A range of factors affect the honey bee population, including colony collapse disorder, Varroa mites, lack of pollen and nectar food sources, pesticides, pathogens andthe changing landscape for honey bee forage.

Could floral diversity such as this improve honey bee pollination?

The Almond Board of California almond growers can contribute to a better bee supply by providing forage in or near their orchards before and/or after almond bloom. PAm has identified four bee forage seed mixtures for the 2013 planting season. These mixtures provide floral diversity prior to and after the almond bloom for the nearly 1.6 million colonies that are delivered to the state. With proper nutrition, bees can fend off many of their stresses.

A secondary benefit to providing bees with an alternative food source, planting these cover crops provides increased soil fertility, better water infiltration, weed suppression and reduced soil erosion and potentially decreased colony rental fees for the orchard.

For best germination, growers should plant bee pastures in September, ahead of fall rains. Almond growers should consider their pesticide practices before deciding where to plant the forage crop. PAm provides the seed and guidance to those growers who are willing to enroll in the program.

To enroll in the pollinator forage project, email PAm.

Patrick Cavanaugh2016-05-31T19:47:05-07:00August 3rd, 2013|

FIELD DAY TARGETS INCREASED CORN YIELD

Project Symphony To Raise Corn Yield for Increasing Population

On Tuesday, August 20, from 10 a.m. to noon, Project Symphony Field Day will take place at:

Double Diamond Dairy

782 West Washington Road or

the NW corner of Highway 59 and Washington Road, El Nido

Sign Up For Our Newsletter!

California Ag News…
At Your Fingertips!

Sign Up For Our Newsletter!

California Ag News… At Your Fingertips!

California Ag News…
At Your Fingertips!