About Patrick Cavanaugh

This author has not yet filled in any details.
So far Patrick Cavanaugh has created 1490 blog entries.

President Obama Comes To Fresno

President Obama Comes to Fresno, Visits West Side

By Patrick Cavanaugh

President Obama arrived in Fresno around 2:30 pm Friday and immediately headed out to the West Side of the San Joaquin Valley to talk with farmers about the worst drought crisis in California’s history. Valley growers had high hopes that his visit would force the issue into the national arena.

California’s Democratic senators, Dianne Feinstein, and Barbara Boxer, as well as Democratic Congressman Jim Costa, were part of the entourage.

Joe 2

Farmer Joe Del Bosque

As they traveled in Marine One on an extensive air tour, they were able to see thousands of acres of fallow land that will have an enormous  impact on family famers, their employees, as well as the state’s economy.

Following a closed door roundtable meeting he emerged with West Side Farmer Joe Del Bosque, praising him for his success in farming. “Joe told me that there are three things that make farming work in California: Soil, Water and People President Obama said. “And in the little free time they have Joe and his wife Maria improve the health and safety of farm workers. There are a lot of people who depend on him year-round and who depend on him seasonally, and their livelihoods depends on the functioning of these farms,” President Obama added.

The main agenda of the President’s visit was to reiterate the promise of more than $170 million in new initiatives to deal with the crisis—including $100 million for ranchers facing livestock losses.

Besides help for ranchers, other significant areas of the drought initiative includes:

    •  $60 million for food programs serving drought-stricken communities in the Central Valley. This will  be of great need for food banks throughout the Central Valley, who will have to provide food for hungry farmworkers.


 $5 million in conservation assistance for the most parched areas of California. The money will help farmers and ranchers “implement conservation practices that conserve scarce water resources,” as well as reduce wind erosion.

  •  $5 million to help communities and landowners with soil stabilization and replenishment of vegetation-stripped areas.
  •  $3 million to help rura
    l communities facing water shortages. State health officials have already identified 17 communities in 10 counties that are in danger of literally running out of water within the next three months due to zero water allocations.

“President Obama and I will continue to do everything within our power to support California farmers, ranchers and families living in drought-stricken areas,” said Tom Vilsack, Secretary of Agriculture on Thursday in a phone interview. “This assistance, coupled with other aid being made available across government, should provide some relief during this difficult time.”

“Thanks to the newly-signed Farm Bill, we are now able to offer long-awaited livestock disaster assistance, which will provide needed stability for California livestock producers impacted by drought,” said Vilsack.

California’s Congressional Republican Comment

California Congressmen David Valadao, Devin Nunes, and Kevin McCarthy issued the following statements today in reaction to President Obama’s remarks on the California water crisis:

“The President missed a prime opportunity today,” said Rep. Valadao. “As farmers, farm workers and communities in the San Joaquin Valley suffer, this Administration has chosen handouts and a climate change lecture over real solutions. We feed the world and all we ask for is a reliable, clean water supply. I will remind the President that my constituents are part of the environment too, and the lack of a long-term solution could spell economic and social destruction for the Central Valley.”

“To blame the California water crisis on global warming is ludicrous,” Rep. Nunes said. “The state has an incredible irrigation system designed to supply water through five years of drought. But as a result of excessive regulations and lawsuits by environmental extremists, we cannot fully use this system, and billions of gallons of water have been flushed into the ocean that could have supplied drought-stricken farmers and communities. Invoking global warming shows ignorance of California’s irrigation system and of basic math and engineering. President Obama could have taken the lead in solving this crisis, but he is apparently more concerned with placating his radical environmentalist allies.”

“The President’s decision to use his visit to California as an opportunity to launch a massive spending initiative to explore the impacts of climate change will simply leave California Central Valley communities dry,” said Rep. McCarthy. “Unfortunately, nothing the President proposed today changes the underlying issue that our communities are not receiving the water they have contracted and paid for; thus exacerbating the impacts of the current and future droughts.

House Republicans on the other hand are continuing to work to find a bipartisan, bicameral solution to ensure our communities are not crippled by future droughts. We look forward to coming together with the Senate to find areas of common ground and commonsense to finally achieve a solution that allows desperately needed water to flow in our state.”

2016-05-31T19:38:58-07:00February 15th, 2014|

STATE WATER BOARD POSTS QUESTIONS, AGENDA FOR FEB. 18- 19 DROUGHT WORKSHOP

DROUGHT WORKSHOP AGENDA

Public Workshop Regarding the Temporary Urgency Change Petition for the

Central Valley and State Water Projects and

State Water Board Water Availability Actions

February 18 & 19, 2014

 

 

The State Water Resources Control Board (State Water Board) is holding a workshop to receive input on its drought-related activities affecting water rights holders.

 

The State Water Board will receive input on the January 31, 2014 State Water Board Order, modified on February 7, 2014, approving a Temporary Urgency Change Petition (TUCP) filed by the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) and United States Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) (collectively referred to as Petitioners) on January 29, 2014, regarding Delta water quality. The Board will also receive input related to Board drought-related water curtailment actions.

 

On February 26, the State Water Board will receive input on other actions that it is, or should be taking in response to continuing drought conditions. Input may address both water right and water quality related programs. See meeting information at the end of this posting.

 

These will be informational workshops only and no State Water Board action will be taken.

 

To assist workshop participants, below are some of the issues that the State Water Board is interested in receiving input on: 

 

Temporary Urgency Change Order (TUCP) (“Order) for the Central Valley Project and State Water Project

 

Is there additional information the Board should consider related to the following findings?

 

1) Is there an urgent need for the changes? Are the changes necessary to maximize the beneficial use of water? Are there any modifications to the Order that should be made to maximize the beneficial use of water?

 

2) Will the changes injure any other lawful user of water?

 

3) Will the changes have an unreasonable effects on fish, wildlife, or other instream beneficial uses?

 

4) Are the changes in the public interest?

 

In particular, the State Water Board is interested in the following questions:

 

5) Are there any additional modifications that should be made to the Order?

 

6) Is there additional information not provided in the TUCP that would better inform the State Water Board’s findings?

 

7) What “triggers” (such as Delta salinity) would support opening the Delta Cross Channel Gates?

 

8) Should the method used to calculate Net Delta Outflow be adjusted during extended dry periods to better inform measures needed to protect Delta salinity (such as opening the Delta Cross Channel gates)? Specifically, should methods used to estimate in-Delta consumptive use during extended dry periods be adjusted?

 

9) How should the quantity of water conserved through changes authorized by the Order be calculated? How should the water be used?

 

10) Based on current reservoir storage and forecasted snowmelt, how much water will be available for Sacramento River temperature control, north of Delta settlement contractor deliveries, and carryover storage in the event of another dry year?

 

11) What other measures, such as barriers in the Delta, may be needed to protect health and safety and maximize the protection of beneficial uses?

 

Curtailment Notices

 

12) How should the Board prioritize its analysis of watersheds to determine whether to issue curtailment notices, and any subsequent enforcement activities?

 

13) How should the State Water Board determine, measure, and enforce Health and Safety limits for junior domestic water rights holders?

 

14) Are there other reasonable use exceptions that should be made in the application of the water rights priority system?

 

15) What minimum flows and reservoir levels are needed for health and safety throughout the summer months, and should this be factored into determinations on whether to curtail?

 

16) Should all water right holders in some watersheds be required to limit diversions to protect instream beneficial uses under the reasonable use and public trust doctrines? If so, how should the State Water Board determine what flows are necessary?

 

Agenda

 

Tuesday, February 18, 2014 – 9:00 a.m.

 

  • Opening Remarks by State Water Board Chair and Board Members

 

  • Opening Remarks by Gordon Burns, Undersecretary for California Environmental Protection Agency, and Janelle Beland, Undersecretary for California Natural Resources Agency

 

  • State Water Board Staff Introduction (Staff Panel)

 

      • Temporary Urgency Change Petition (TUCP) for the Central Valley Project and State Water Project

 

      • Curtailment Notices

 

      • Other Requests for Transfers and Change Petitions (Russian River TUCP)

 

      • FERC Hydropower Project Flows

 

 

  • Department of Water Resources and U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Presentation (Panel)

 

      • Statewide Hydrologic Conditions

 

      •  TUCP for the Central Valley Project and State Water Project

 

      • Transfers

 

  • Department of Fish and Wildlife, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Fisheries Presentation (Panel)

 

      • Statewide Issues

 

      • TUCP for the Central Valley Project and State Water Projects

 

  • Real Time Drought Operations Team

 

  • Comments from the Public (parties with similar interests are encouraged to form panels)

 

 

Wednesday, February 19, 2014 – 9:00 a.m.

 

  • Comments from the Public to be continued, if necessary

 

 

State Water Board Actions to Increase Water Conservation, Reuse, 

Recycling and other Drought Related Measures 

Wednesday, February 26, 2014 – 9:00 a.m. 

Joe Serna Jr. – Cal/EPA Headquarters Building

Coastal Hearing Room

1001 I Street, Second Floor

Sacramento, CA 95814

2016-05-31T19:38:58-07:00February 13th, 2014|

GSA AND MCFB TO HOLD JOINT WATER COMMITTEE MEETING on WASTE DISCHARGE VS. AG ORDER Differentiation

Waste Discharge Requirement vs. Ag Order Differentiation on Feb. 25th

 

 

Conversations about how the 2017 Irrigated Lands Regulatory program might evolve are expected to begin later this year. To prepare our members and to gain valuable input on next steps, the Grower-Shipper Association of Central California and Monterey County Farm Bureau have asked Gail Delihant (Western Growers) and Danny Merkley (California Farm Bureau Federation) to join us at a joint water committee meeting to discuss the difference between a Waste Discharge Requirement and an Ag Order (see handout prepared by Tess Dunham here). At this meeting, they will provide examples of successful WDR programs, explain the costs and expectations of such an alternative, go over pros and cons, and be available to answer questions.

 

GSA/MCFB Joint Water Committee Meeting

Tuesday, February 25, 2014

10:00 a.m.

Grower-Shipper Association of Central California

512 Pajaro St., Salinas, CA

2016-05-31T19:38:58-07:00February 13th, 2014|

IMPERIAL VALLEY NEGOTIATES TO SAVE NATIONAL BEEF PLANT

Brawley City Council Updated On National Beef Negotiations

 

Source:  The Desert Review (thedesertreview.com)

  

At the adjourned regular meeting yesterday, the Brawley City Council was updated on the ongoing negotiations with National Beef in Kansas City, Mo. to avert their plant closure scheduled for April 4, reported The Desert Review. This intended plan closure has had an immediate ripple effect as feeder cattle have begun to be shipped out of the Valley to other feedlots.

 

Mayor Don Campbell appointed Mayor Pro-Tempore George Nava and Councilman Don Wharton to the Imperial Valley Ad Hoc Committee to create and present an incentive package to National Beef.

Brawley

Brawley Councilman Don Wharton and Mayor Pro-Tempore George Nava

 

Other members of the committee include: Imperial County Supervisors Ryan Kelley, Ray Castillo, and CEO Ralph Cordova;

 

Imperial Irrigation District Director President James Hanks, Director Matt Dessert, and General Manager Kevin Kelley; Cattlemen Paul Cameron and Bill Plourd; and Brawley City Manager Rosanna Bayon Moore.

 

The City of Brawley proposed a $700,000 reduction in utility wastewater charges annually as part of the package.

 

“City Manager Rosanna Bayon Moore was quick to gather some impact data for the committee concerning the closure,” said Wharton. “We are in a compressed time line and, putting our best foot forward, we had to achieve a figure in order to get the proposal together. It will be worked through by city staff if it is accepted. This figure was felt achievable through the data received and a reduction of our water rate from IID.”

 

Imperial County has offered $3 million from their Agriculture Benefits Fund to help National Beef come into compliance with the Regional Water Quality Control Board. An estimated $13.8 million investment would be required to upgrade their wastewater pretreatment system.

 

Imperial Irrigation District has offered a $2.1 million in annual energy rate reductions for ten years.

 

The Gas Company has also offered a rate reduction.

 

The California Governor’s Office has reached out to National Beef management.

 

Local feedlots are looking for ways to increase their cattle numbers. Imperial County is working with the cattle vendors to expand feedlots. National Beef has stated this is the main reason for the closure—low cattle supply.

 

The cattle vendors have said that they will supply National Beef with 481,523 head of cattle for 2014, 500,000 head for 2015, and a 10% increase for 2016. These figures include cattle from the Imperial Valley and approximately 150,000 cattle from other feedlots outside the Valley.

 

National Beef said that to operate the Brawley plant at optimum capacity they would need 650,000 head of cattle per year.

 

“We felt the offer of lower utility costs and some help with the wastewater issues would offset the shortfall of cattle supply and make the cost per head of cattle lower, resulting in National Beef reconsidering the closure,” said Nava.

 

National Beef has stuck closely to their January 31 notice of the closure to Brawley and Imperial County, citing the lack of cattle as the main justification. The closure announcement set into motion many legal requirements such as notification to labor unions.

 

“National Beef has asked for nothing,” said Nava. “The Ad Hoc Committee tried to capture their attention, and we put together a package that we thought would do that—doing what we could do as city and county entities. We just wanted to get them to the table.”

 

A smaller group within the Ad Hoc Committee presented the package to National Beef on Saturday morning. Ryan Kelley, George Nava, Paul Cameron, and Bill Plourd met with National Beef General Manager Brian Webb at National Beef and with National Beef COO Terry Wilkerson via conference call.

 

“National Beef said they would give us some type of response Wednesday,” said Nava. “They called back 2 hours later with some questions. It was a good sign. We have to remember that this is just a proposal and nothing is set in stone. They listened and made a commitment to get back to us. We are trying to answer all of their questions.”

 

The cattle industry is a billion dollar industry for Imperial Valley.

 

“If the plant closes on April 4th, it would mean an immediate 18% addition to the unemployment rolls,” said Wharton. “This is on top of the 27% unemployment we have now. That figure is staggering.”

 

The cattle vendors are still negotiating with National Beef. “We are doing what we can to fight for our employees and fight to save the cattle industry here in the Imperial Valley,” said Mesquite Feedlot President Paul Cameron.

2016-05-31T19:38:58-07:00February 13th, 2014|

USDA, CDFA TO HOLD DROUGHT RESOURCE SESSIONS; UPCOMING FED DEADLINES

Multiple State/Fed Agencies to Hold 5 Drought Sessions Around State

 

As California faces one of the driest years ever recorded, the California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA) and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) will be holding informational sessions on drought resources for farmers, ranchers and farmworkers in several locations throughout the state in the coming weeks.

 

These sessions will provide information on a variety of state and federal government programs designed to assist farmers with water conservation, crop insurance, and other on-farm management tools. Information on farmworker assistance programs will also be available.

 

Upcoming application deadlines for federal programs include:

  • Crop insurance programs offered by the USDA’s Risk Management Agency (February 28th)
  • Non-insured crop insurance offered by the USDA’s Farm Service Agency (March 1st)
  • Water conservation enhancements offered by the USDA’s Natural Resources Conservation Service (March 3rd).

 

These programs offer a variety of on-farm assistance, including cover crops and tree pruning, as well as market-based risk management tools.

 

Informational sessions will be held on the following dates/locations:

February 18, 2014      6p.m. to 8p.m.            Redding/Palo Cedro

Junction Elementary School – Theater Room

9087 Deschutes Road

Palo Cedro, CA 96073

 

February 19, 2014      6p.m. to 8p.m.            Salinas/Monterey County Agricultural Commissioner’s Office

1428 Abbott Street

Salinas, CA 93901

 

February 20, 2014      6p.m. to 8p.m.            Fresno

Fresno County Farm Bureau

1274 W. Hedges Ave

Fresno, CA 93728

 

February 25, 2014      6p.m. to 8p.m.            Ventura/Camarillo

Ventura County Agricultural Commissioner’s Office

555 Airport Way, Suite E

Camarillo, CA 93010

 

February 26, 2014      6p.m. to 8p.m.            SanDiego/Escondido        

San Diego County Farm Bureau

1670 E. Valley Parkway

Escondido, CA 92027

 

Several state/federal government entities will be represented at these information sessions, including:

  • USDA Farm Service Agency
  • USDA Risk Management Agency
  • USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service
  • USDA Rural Development
  • California Employment Development Department

 

CDFA continues to support California’s drought response and:

  • Has developed a web page as an information clearinghouse on assistance programs for farmers, ranchers and farmworkers
  • Will continue to work with California food banks to address drought-related impacts
  • Is working with the University of California to develop a real-time assessment of drought impacts in farming and ranching communities.

 

With California facing one of the most severe droughts on record, Governor Brown declared a drought State of Emergency last month and directed state officials to take all necessary actions to prepare for water shortages. Governor Brown has spoken with President Obama about crucial federal support during the ongoing drought, and the state continues to work with federal partners to ensure a coordinated drought response. The administration has also expressed support for federal legislation introduced by Senators Feinstein and Boxer and Representatives Jim Costa, Tony Cárdenas and Sam Farr.

 

Across state government, action is being taken. The Department of General Services is leading water conservation efforts at state facilities, and the Department of Transportation is cutting water usage along California’s roadways by 50 percent. Caltrans has also launched a public awareness campaign, putting a water conservation message on their more than 700 electronic highway signs.

 

In January, the state took action to conserve water in numerous Northern California reservoirs to meet minimum needs for operations impacting the environment and the economy. The State Water Resources Control Board announced it would work with hydropower generators and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to preserve water in California reservoirs. Recently the California Department of Fish and Wildlife and the California Fish and Game Commission restricted fishing on some waterways due to low water flows worsened by the drought.

 

The state is working to protect local communities from the dangers of extreme drought. The California Department of Public Health identified and offered assistance to communities at risk of severe drinking water shortages and is working with other state and local agencies to develop solutions for vulnerable communities. CAL FIRE hired additional firefighters and is continuously adjusting staffing throughout the state to help address the increased fire threat due to drought conditions. The California Department of Food and Agriculture launched a drought website to help farmers, ranchers and farmworkers find resources and assistance programs that may be available to them during the drought.

 

Even as the state deals with the immediate impacts of the drought, it’s also planning for the future. Recently, the California Natural Resources Agency, the California Environmental Protection Agency and CDFA released the California Water Action Plan, which will guide state efforts to enhance water supply reliability, restore damaged and destroyed ecosystems and improve the resilience of our infrastructure.

 

Governor Brown has called on all Californians to voluntarily reduce their water usage by 20 percent, and the Save Our Water campaign launched four public service announcements encouraging residents to conserve and has resources available in Spanish. Last December, the Governor formed a Drought Task Force to review expected water allocations and California’s preparedness for water scarcity. In May 2013, Governor Brown issued an Executive Order to direct state water officials to expedite the review and processing of voluntary transfers of water and water rights.

2016-05-31T19:38:58-07:00February 13th, 2014|

PG&E ELECTRICAL RATE DEFERMENT COULD HELP FARMERS

 PG&E Electrical Rate Deferment To help Farmers 

Source: CFBF

 

As a result of concerns first brought to attention by Farm Bureau members in the Sacramento Valley, some Pacific Gas and Electric Co. agricultural customers may be able to retain PG&E electric rate options to help farmers and encourage effective groundwater management.

Document25

The California Farm Bureau Federation (CFBF) announced TODAY it is working with PG&E on a request to the California Public Utilities Commission, to delay PG&E Electrical rate increases by one year on the ordered March 1 termination of AG-R and AG-V agricultural electricity rate schedules.

 

More than 1,000 agricultural customers served on AG-R and AG-V rates would have been transferred to different time-of-use electricity rates, forcing groundwater pumping into narrow windows of time, placing additional stress on local groundwater supplies, and decreasing the amount of water available for agricultural and residential customers.

 

Karen Norene Mills, CFBF associate counsel and Public Utilities Department director, said members of the Butte County Farm Bureau contacted her, raising concerns about the combination of drought and the scheduled elimination of the AG-R and AG-V rates.

 

“Members collected specific information about the impacts, which we packaged and presented to PG&E for consideration,” Mills said. “PG&E worked with us to quickly submit a request to the CPUC to defer elimination of the rates for a year.”

 

She said the existing AG-R and AG-V schedules allow for longer, continuous off-peak periods during weekday hours, which, when coupled with weekend off-peak hours, accommodate certain irrigation practices that require minimum continuous water application.

 

Elimination of the schedules would bring significant changes in startup times for agricultural pumps, Mills said, leading to a concentration of Saturday morning start times for pumps. To be cost-effective and to provide the best opportunity for water coverage, she said, a longer run time is required than the interrupted off-peak periods during the week allowed on other schedules.

 

Allan Fulton, University of California Cooperative Extension irrigation and water resources farm advisor in Tehama, Glenn, Colusa and Shasta counties, warned that changes in the utility’s pricing structure would encourage agricultural pumpers to concentrate their groundwater pumping to narrower windows of time, in order to utilize the lower electricity rates. This would result in groundwater management problems and lead to greater drawing down of the water table, Fulton added.

 

“If more agricultural water users are incentivized to turn on their pumps at the same time during narrower windows of time, it will lead to greater drawdown of the water table and put more water wells at risk of drawing air and not performing efficiently,” Fulton said. “Rural homeowners with small domestic wells will be at greatest risk, because they are typically not constructed as deep as irrigation wells.”

 

Pumping groundwater during a longer window of time is an important element to managing competition for groundwater and sustaining reliable and affordable supplies, Fulton said.

 

Farmer Rich McGowan, who grows prunes, almonds and walnuts north of Chico, said changes to the PG&E time-of-use rate system would cause “absolute havoc,” especially now.

 

“Locally, we’ve been experiencing this problem on a smaller scale, even before the drought,” McGowan said. “Some neighbors would turn on a pump and would notice if the farmer across the street turned his pump on at the same time, they both would draw down and suck air. It is not completely new to us, but the drought amplifies the problem greatly. We don’t want to stress our very, critically important water source by starting all of these pumps on the same day.”

 

Almond and walnut grower Ed McLaughlin of Durham called maintenance of the water table an important issue in his rural community for farmers and residents.

 

“We try to start off the (irrigation) season staggered, so one weekend my neighbor is irrigating and the next weekend we irrigate. It’s become more complicated because they’ve shortened up the window of hours and forced us to be off-peak,” McLaughlin said.

 

PG&E said it wants to find a workable solution and filed a joint request to the CPUC to defer the termination date for schedules AG-R and AG-V until March 15, 2015.

 

The utility said it appreciated Farm Bureau’s prompt action to inform PG&E about the issue, and said it shares agricultural customers’ concerns about maintaining electric rate options that support water conservation.

 

Pat Mullen, PG&E agricultural customer service region director, said the company is “doing everything we can to help our farmer and rancher customers during this extreme drought. Supporting this rate deferral was just one way to try to provide additional support and flexibility to our ag customers.”

 

The CPUC would need to approve the request in order for it to take effect. CFBF attorney Mills said a date for commission action on the request has not yet been set.

 

Mullen added that PG&E is considering additional staffing to handle the increased applications and service for pumps and wells, as well as additional energy efficiency programs and incentives to help customers reduce energy and water use.

 

“We are encouraging our ag customers to apply early if they are considering adding electrical service for new pumps and wells,” Mullen said, directing people interested in adding service to www.pge.com under “new services.”

 

California Farm Bureau Federation

 

2016-05-31T19:38:58-07:00February 12th, 2014|

WORLD AG EXPO ATTRACTS THOUSANDS

 Adventures at the World Ag Expo, which Attracts Thousands

Optimism Despite Drought

 

By Patrick Cavanaugh, Editor

 

Under dark morning skies that looked like impending rain, which gave way to unwelcomed blue skies that reminded attendees of the drought, the first day of 47th Annual World Ag Expo, which attracted an estimated crowed of more than 30,000.

On Wednesday

 

The drought was heavy on everyone’s mind, yet the spirit of optimism permeated the exhibits of equipment, supplies and services for the Ag industry. Even the dairy pavilion was packed with dairymen and women from around the country looking at more efficient ways to take care of their cows.

 

“If you do not have your own ground to farm for forage, you are not going to be in the dairy business long,” said David Pinheiro, a partner in Joe Pinheiro and Sons Dairy who milks about 1200 cows in Tulare County. “The last 9 years have been horrible and about 25 percent of the dairies are gone,” he said. But currently milk prices are at a record high. “We have never seen prices this high ever, period. The first half of the year should be really good, but we are worried about that forth quarter.”

World Ag Photo

 

They have land around their dairy, but it has required ground water for irrigation. “Our wells are drying up and some of them are actually breaking and creating subsidence, and the ground is actually shifting. If you want a new well, you have to wait a year; that’s where the demand is.”

 

We ran into a cattleman from Northern Sonoma County who noted that he has seen better times for his Angus cows. “The state should have saved its water when things were going good so we could have avoided worrying about when it’s going to rain now,” said John P. (he would not give his last name.) “We have too many people drinking out of the same water hole.

 

Seminar speaker Seth Hoyt, editor of the Hoyt report, said alfalfa supplies would be lower this year, which will drive up prices to around $320 to $340 a ton. “It’s another big concern of dairy industry. The lack of rain fall is driving the shortage,” Hoyt said.

 

Then we met Al Biancho, a long time tractor salesman originally from New York, but now living in Fresno. Biancho has been attending the World Ag Expo ever since it started at the Tulare Fairgounds, 47 years ago.

 

Biancho was instrumental in helping to make the World Ag Expo what it is today. Way back, he brought in a Komatsu tractor, the largest in the world, and he put the smallest tractor on top of it, making it a grand spectacle. (Note that Komatsu built the first prototype agricultural tractor in in 1932.)

 

“This was such a unique vision nearly 45 years ago, it made a lot of press, and the show went international at that time,” said Biancho.

 

“One of the largest farmers in California bought the big tractor. That farmer produced crops on 230,000 acres. The name of the company was Boston Land Company, later known as J.G Boswell Company based in Corcoran, Calif. In fact, they bought 44 of them at one time! They also replaced their D-8 crawler tractor with a smaller D-6 size tractor on wheels that had much more horsepower and the ability to run at four mph, instead of 1.5 mph. They increased their production by 35 percent!”

 

Then we came across David Zeiders, a Pest Control Advisor in Merced. He was at the show to find anything new and innovative that could help his growers be more efficient with their water usage—which is crucial right now.

 

“Almonds, walnuts and pistachios are very valuable crops so I am looking for any crop protection materials that can increase yields for growers,” noted Zeiders. “I am looking for anything I can to help the crops nutrient-wise and protect them from pathogens. I also work with dairies and want to find the best alfalfa and corn seed that will provide the best yields and resistance management. The World Ag Expo has all the companies that can provide these new tools for growers.”

 

Faith McCoy is one of many students attending the World Ag Expo to learn more and even find careers. McCoy is also the Mariposa County Vice President for FFA. “The Expo is a great opportunity for ag students to see all the different aspects of agriculture, all in one spot. You can learn more about agriculture and you meet other people of common interest,” she said.

 

As the World Ag Expo attracts thousands each day, the milk coolers at the Expo Dairy Barn are constantly being replenished with ice cream and chocolate milk, popular refreshment at the Expo.

 

There were also many retired farmers who wanted to see what was new in the industry, after they finally put down the shovel. 

2016-05-31T19:38:58-07:00February 12th, 2014|

CALIFORNIA, OREGON SENATORS INTRODUCE DROUGHT RELIEF LEGISLATION

California Emergency Drought Relief Act Of 2014 Would Fund  $300 Million For Drought-Relief And Assistance

Federal Agencies Mandated To Maximize, Expedite Drought-Relief Efforts

 

Senators Dianne Feinstein and Barbara Boxer (both D-Calif.) and Ron Wyden and Jeff Merkley (both D-Ore.) TODAY introduced the California Emergency Drought Relief Act of 2014, a bill to help California and Oregon farmers, businesses and communities suffering from historic drought conditions.

 

The legislation comes on the heels of weekend rain in California and Oregon and snow in the Sierra; nevertheless the drought, which could be worse than the historic dry conditions of 1976 and 1977, already threatens California’s $44.7 billion agriculture sector. Safe drinking water is also in danger of running out in at least 10 California communities.

 

In a press release, Senator Feinstein said: “This drought has the potential to devastate Western states, especially California, and Congress and the president must take swift action. This bill provides operational flexibility to increase water supplies and primes federal agencies to make the best use of any additional rain. With so little water available, we must focus on streamlining federal programs and provide what assistance we can to those farmers and communities being hit the hardest.”

 

Senator Boxer said: “Our bill will require all agencies to use their existing authority to help provide relief to communities hardest hit by this unprecedented drought and make investments to move and conserve water to help our entire state. The goal of this bill is to bring us together to address this crisis, rather than divide us.”

 

Senator Wyden said: “Drought is already hitting Southern Oregon farmers and ranchers in the Klamath Basin, with Klamath County issuing a drought declaration two months earlier than last year. This bill can provide sorely needed relief by making sure that agencies can send scarce water to the communities that need it the most.”

 

Senator Merkley said: “Even though the Willamette Valley was hit hard by snow over the weekend, Oregon is still experiencing a terrible drought, especially in Southern Oregon. Snowpack in the Klamath Basin is only 20% of normal. We need to start preparing now because water shortages are nearly inevitable. This bill will provide emergency funding for important drought-relief projects that will help conserve water where we can and make sure the water we have gets to where it’s needed most.”

 

Unlike the House bill, this Senate bill does not waive any federal or state law, but includes a range of provisions that require federal agencies use existing powers to maximize water supplies, reduce project review times and ensure water is directed to users whose need is greatest. The bill also provides $300 million in emergency funds to be used on a range of projects to maximize water supplies for farmers, consumers and municipalities and provide economic assistance.

 

Maintaining sufficient supplies of safe drinking water to meet minimum public health and safety needs is a top priority in the bill. One key grant program, the Emergency Community Water Assistance Grants, will receive $25 million for projects to increase the availability of drinking water.

 

Additionally, the bill prioritizes grant funding under EPA’s Drinking and Clean Water State Revolving Funds and the Bureau of Reclamation’s WaterSMART program for projects that boost drinking and municipal water supplies.

 

Westlands Water District issued a statement TODAY that it is encouraged by the California Emergency Drought Relief Act of 2014, and Westlands supports the passage of the legislation. “Water supply reductions resulting from extraordinary dry conditions have been exacerbated by the implementation in prior years of regulations imposed under federal law on the operations of the federal Central Valley Project (CVP) and the California State Water Project (SWP).”

 

The legislation introduced today would provide much needed relief for the public water agencies that receive water from these projects and for the people, farms, and businesses they serve.

The legislation mandates that federal agencies act with a sense of urgency and be as flexible as the law allows in order to minimize water supply reductions resulting from the application of those regulations. In particular, direction to manage reverse flow in Old and Middle Rivers, as prescribed by the 2008 biological opinion issued by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, to minimize water supply reductions for the CVP and the SWP and direction to maintain a one-to- one inflow/export ratio during the period from April 1 through May 31 to enable voluntary water transfers and exchanges, have the potential of generating in excess of 500,000 acre-feet for public water agencies that receive water from the CVP and the SWP.

Through its work with Senator Feinstein and Senator Boxer, Westlands knows that they are genuinely interested in working with their colleagues in the House of Representatives to find a legislative solution to the chronic water supply shortages that have devastated the San Joaquin Valley and other regions of the State. The District looks forward to working with them and members of the House of Representatives to find common sense solutions that serve the interests of all Californians.

 

Key provisions in the bill:

•Provides federal authorization and orders the Interior and Commerce Departments to cooperate with a California Water Resources Board plan to keep the Delta Cross Channel Gates open as long as possible to allow more water to be delivered without endangering migrating salmon. This action is expected to save thousands of acre feet of water from upstream reservoirs each month this spring;

 

•Mandates that federal agencies use flexibility under existing law to maximize water supplies using Delta pumping. Under the Delta smelt biological opinion, which is required by the Endangered Species Act, pumping that results in “reverse flows” of water between -1,250 and -5,000 cubic-feet-per-second is permitted for the Old and Middle Rivers between December and June. This “reverse flow” occurs when the state and federal water pumps are turned on to draw water from the rivers into the South Delta for water users. The bill requires federal agencies to operate the pumps within this range to maximize water supplies while remaining consistent with the biological opinion and the Endangered Species Act;

 

•Directs the Department of the Interior to maintain in April and May a 1:1 “inflow-to-export ratio” for San Joaquin River flows that result from water transfers and exchanges. This means water districts willing to sell or trade surplus supplies to districts with less water can move 100 percent of that surplus water through the Delta instead of just a fraction. This will also allow greater water transfers if California receives additional rain.

 

•Amends the Stafford Act to provide additional individual emergency assistance for major droughts when a state of emergency declaration is made by the president;

 

•Authorizes additional expenditures above existing funding caps for the Reclamation States Emergency Drought Relief Act (from $90 million to $190 million) and the WaterSMART program (from $200 million to $250 million). These programs channel funds to water projects that can lead to increased water supplies;

 

•Prioritize WaterSMART grants to provide emergency water supplies to communities at risk of losing access to water sufficient to meet basic public health and safety needs; to prevent the loss of permanent crops; and to minimize economic damage caused by the drought;

 

•Mandates that the federal government issue final decisions for projects and operations that can provide additional water supply benefits within 10 days of a request from the state;

 

•Authorizes funding for federal agencies to develop other water sources, such as groundwater wells and water purchases, for Central Valley Project wildlife refuges so that surface water saved can be used for drinking water and crops;

 

•Authorizes water planning and management activities to reduce water use in the Klamath Basin;

 

•Extends the period during which water contractors can take deliveries of 2013 water from February 28 to April 15, allowing them more flexibility to manage their 2014 supplies; and

 

•Authorizes contractors facing economic hardship to delay federal fee payments related to water deliveries.

 

Funding increases for drought assistance programs:

•$100 million in emergency funds for Department of the Interior projects to rapidly increase water supplies;

 

•$100 million in emergency assistance for farmers to fund water conservation measures that protect lands and sensitive watersheds;

 

•$25 million to the Emergency Community Water Assistance Grants program for water conservation projects and to protect and upgrade water systems. These grants of up to $1 million are to complete projects that boost the availability and quality of drinking water, including in California communities at risk of running out of safe drinking water;

 

•$25 million for Pre-Disaster Mitigation Grants that fund community projects to reduce harmful effects of the drought;

 

•$25 million in grant funding for public and nonprofit institutions to provide emergency assistance to low-income migrant and seasonal farmworkers who are directly harmed by the drought;

 

•$25 million in grants for private forest landowners to carry out conservation measures in response to drought and wildlife risks; and

 

•Allows the Secretary of Agriculture to help cover losses caused by the drought through the Emergency Assistance for Livestock, Honeybees, and Farm-Raised Fish Program.

 

This bill is the product of a series of discussions and meetings with a wide range of federal and state departments and agencies that oversee water deliveries and economic assistance programs. Federal agencies consulted include the Bureau of Reclamation, the Fish and Wildlife Service, the National Marine Fisheries Service, the Federal Emergency Management Agency, the Environmental Protection Agency and the Department of Agriculture. State agencies include the California Resources Agency, the California Water Resources Control Board, the California Department of Water Resources and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife.

 

While California is the only state that has declared a statewide drought emergency, other states could benefit from this legislation. All 17 Western states covered by the Bureau of Reclamation could qualify for Department of the Interior water grants. In addition, states that have declared local drought emergencies could qualify for USDA emergency funding including Arkansas, Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Idaho, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Oregon, Texas and Utah.

 

Experts say California’s two-year drought could be worse than the record drought of 1976 and 1977, resulting in the fallowing of more than half-a-million acres of farmland.

 

California precipitation data

•Rain and snow: Between Thursday and Sunday, the San Joaquin Valley saw average precipitation amounts less than one inch, while the Sacramento Valley received between two and three inches. Precipitation in the Northern Sierra between Friday and Monday was about seven inches, while the Southern Sierra saw more than three inches.

 

•According to the state, California would need to experience heavy rain and snow regularly between now and May to achieve average annual rain and snowfall, and even then the state would remain in drought conditions.

 

•Snowpack: Snowpack in the Sierra is well below average. As of February 10, the northern Sierra is at 19percent of normal for the date; the central Sierra is 36 percent of normal for the date and the southern Sierra is 26 percent of normal for the date. Statewide, snowpack is 29 percent of normal for the date.

 

Other California data

•Reservoirs: Storage in major reservoirs in California remains around one-third of capacity. As of February 9, Lake Shasta (California’s largest reservoir) and Lake Oroville (the State Water Project’s primary reservoir) were both at 37 percent of capacity. San Luis Reservoir, key for South-of-Delta contractors, was at 30 percent of capacity.

 

•Drinking water: As of the beginning of February, at least 10 communities are in danger of running out of drinking water in the next two months.

 

•Drought emergency and conservation: Governor Jerry Brown on January 17, as part of his emergency drought declaration, called for a 20 percent reduction in water use. And on January 31, for the first time ever, the state Department of Water Resources announced a projected allocation of zero.

 

2016-05-31T19:38:58-07:00February 11th, 2014|

PETALUMA SLAUGHTERHOUSE SHUTS DOWN AFTER CLASS I RECALL

Rancho Feeding Corp. Voluntarily Ceases Operations

 

Credit goes to: Jamie Hansen, Heather Irwin, The Press Democrat; FSIS

 

Rancho Feeding Corporation, a Petaluma slaughterhouse at the center of a growing Class I recall, has voluntarily ceased operations while it attempts to track down and retrieve every shipment of beef from the facility over the past year.

 

The U.S. Department of Agriculture announced the expanded recall on Saturday, saying Rancho “processed diseased and unsound animals” without a full inspection. The meat products are “unsound, unwholesome or otherwise are unfit for human food” and must be removed from commerce, according to the department’s Food Safety and Inspection Service.

 

Beef carcasses and boxes were labeled with establishment number “est. 527” inside the USDA mark of inspection and the case code number ending in 3 or 4. The products were produced Jan. 1, 2013 through Jan. 7, 2014 and shipped to distribution centers and retail establishments in California, Florida, Illinois and Texas.

 

To date, there have been no reported cases of illness from eating the meat.

 

A company spokesperson told California Ag Today that the establishment was making no public statements; all information could be found at The Press Democrat, Petaluma.

 

According to The Press Democrat, Robert Singleton, who owns Rancho with partner Jesse “Babe” Amaral, on Monday night said the company undertook the recall out of “an abundance of caution” and regrets any inconvenience to customers.

 

Singleton confirmed the company had voluntarily ceased processing and was compiling a list of affected companies. He declined further comment.

 

The enormous scale of the recall, the second recall at the facility in less than a month, raised questions about the future of the North Bay’s last beef processing facility and set off criticism of federal regulators by local ranchers who rely on Rancho Feeding Corp. to slaughter their cattle.

 

The facility is the only USDA-inspected animal processing facility in Sonoma, Napa, Marin, Lake and Mendocino counties, with the exception of a small plant for sheep and goats near Occidental. The plant serves a growing, high-end beef market, including grass-fed and organic cattle. Those ranchers use Rancho to kill their animals and take the carcasses for butchering and sale via markets, restaurants and farmers markets. As well, Rancho buys and slaughters older dairy cattle.

 

The 8.7-million pounds of recalled meat is much larger than other meat-related recalls issued across the country this month, which range from 365 to 144,000 pounds. But it is considerably smaller than the largest recall on record: In 2008, the California-based Hallmark/Westland Meat Packing Company recalled 143 million pounds.

 

The investigation into the meat processed at Rancho Feeding Corp., which in the past was known as Rancho Veal Corp., is ongoing, according to the Inspection Service. There are numerous steps involved in slaughtering an animal, and federal inspectors must be present to ensure that the animal is killed in a humane matter and that it does not show signs of disease. It is not yet clear which part of the process inspectors missed, if the plant’s operations will be suspended as they were in January, or how long the investigation will continue.

 

Over the years, Rancho Veal has been targeted by animal rights activists. Police in 2000 said arsonists set fires at the plant and at two poultry operations also in Sonoma County. That same year, animal rights activists demonstrated outside Rancho Veal.

 

Sonoma County Agricultural Commissioner Tony Linegar commented that without the plant, “our producers would be really hard-pressed to stay in business.” 

 

Tim Tesconi, executive director of the Sonoma County Farm Bureau, called that fact a good sign and said he was surprised to hear about the scale of this recall. “From what I’ve heard they make a great product,” he said. “This is very puzzling.”

 

Local dairy rancher and former president of the Sonoma County Farm Bureau board of directors, Doug Beretta said the plant’s closure impacted some local ranchers, who were forced to truck their cattle about 2 1/2 hours away to slaughterhouses in Los Banos and Modesto.

 

Tesconi and Beretta both said that a prolonged closure could pose a real hardship for small local ranchers who rely on the facility. Tesconi said that the Farm Bureau supports the desire of the U.C. Cooperative Extension and others to see additional local USDA-inspected facilities arrive to meet the need of “the growing number of small growers doing grass-fed beef.”

 

Some North Bay ranchers and meat purveyors also questioned the logic behind the far-reaching recall, given that most of the beef was long ago consumed and there are no reports of anyone becoming ill after eating the beef.

 

“There should have been no recall,” said Tara Smith, owner of Tara Firma Farms in Petaluma.

 

Smith was among the producers directly affected from the original Jan. 13 recall by Rancho. She estimated she lost about $8,000 worth of organically raised beef that she claimed was raised and processed according to proper health and safety procedures.

 

“The extensive publicity was unfair not only to Rancho but also to the many producers who now have to inform their customers of the recall,” Smith said.

 

Longtime cattle buyer Ken Maffei of Petaluma said he has known Amaral and Singleton for 35 years and the two men would not knowingly slaughter diseased or unsound animals.

 

“Show me evidence,” Maffei demanded. “It’s all hearsay.”

 

He contended that federal regulators were “overdoing it to the max” with a yearlong recall.

 

Adam Parks, owner of Victorian Farmstead Meat Company in Sebastopol, said he couldn’t understand the logic of a yearlong recall because nearly all the meat already has been consumed. Nonetheless, he will reach out to customers who purchased grass-fed cattle that he had processed at Rancho during the affected dates.

 

Parks, who purchases cattle from ranchers, acknowledged it will be “an incredible expense and inconvenience” if Rancho closes and he has to ship all his beef to Eureka or the Central Valley for processing. Even so, he insisted such a closure wouldn’t be the death knell for the North Coast beef industry.

 

“We’ll survive it,” Parks said.

 

2016-05-31T19:38:59-07:00February 11th, 2014|
Go to Top